{
    "meta": {
        "type": "insight_article",
        "language": "en-GB",
        "last_updated": "2026-10-16",
        "ai_endpoint": "/insights/what-googles-latest-spam-update-means-for-website-content/ai.json",
        "source_page": "/insights/what-googles-latest-spam-update-means-for-website-content/"
    },
    "retrieval_summary": {
        "what": "Explain what Google’s September 2026 spam update means for website content and AI-assisted content, and help website owners understand what they should review.",
        "who": {
            "organisation": "Feel Created"
        },
        "relevant_for": [
            "Website owners",
            "Digital teams",
            "Marketing teams",
            "Content teams"
        ],
        "problems_solved": [
            "Websites accumulating large numbers of overlapping pages covering similar subjects",
            "AI making it easier to publish content without questioning necessity or factual accuracy",
            "Content produced primarily to attract search traffic rather than help people",
            "Difficulty for users to find information due to overlapping content",
            "Understanding the impact of Google's spam update on website content",
            "Determining if AI-assisted content poses a risk to search rankings",
            "Investigating changes in organic search traffic",
            "Reviewing and improving existing website content"
        ]
    },
    "page": {
        "title": "What Google’s latest spam update means for website content",
        "slug": "what-googles-latest-spam-update-means-for-website-content",
        "url": "/insights/what-googles-latest-spam-update-means-for-website-content/",
        "canonical_url": "https://www.feelcreated.com/insights/what-googles-latest-spam-update-means-for-website-content/",
        "status": "published"
    },
    "article": {
        "type": "Insight article",
        "primary_topic": "Google’s September 2026 spam update and its implications for website content, AI-assisted content and content quality.",
        "intent": "Explain what Google’s September 2026 spam update means for website content and AI-assisted content, and help website owners understand what they should review.",
        "author": {
            "name": "Dan Clark",
            "organisation": "Feel Created",
            "bio": "Lead Developer at Feel Created, focusing on the development of high-performance WordPress websites and bespoke digital solutions."
        },
        "audience": [
            "Website owners",
            "Digital teams",
            "Marketing teams",
            "Content teams"
        ]
    },
    "topics": [
        "Google’s September 2026 spam update and its implications for website content, AI-assisted content and content quality.",
        "AI-generated content",
        "Scaled content abuse",
        "Helpful content guidance",
        "Content strategy",
        "Search rankings",
        "Google spam update",
        "Content quality",
        "Search performance"
    ],
    "content_focus": [
        "Understanding Google spam updates",
        "AI in content production",
        "Content quality and usefulness",
        "Search performance implications",
        "Google spam update analysis",
        "Website performance review"
    ],
    "canonical_claims": [
        {
            "claim": "Google's September spam update does not introduce new rules for using AI, and there is no evidence that organisations using AI-assisted content are automatically penalised.",
            "evidence_type": "page_content",
            "evidence_strength": "medium",
            "source_section": "what-should-website-owners-take-from-this",
            "id": "claim-001"
        },
        {
            "claim": "Using AI to create content is not risky per se, but using it to produce large volumes of low-value content primarily to manipulate rankings is against Google's policies.",
            "evidence_type": "page_content",
            "evidence_strength": "medium",
            "source_section": "does-using-ai-to-write-website-content-put-you-at-risk",
            "id": "claim-002"
        },
        {
            "claim": "Google's September 2026 spam update affected search results worldwide, but Google has not confirmed which specific spam practices were targeted.",
            "evidence_type": "page_content",
            "evidence_strength": "medium",
            "source_section": "overview",
            "id": "claim-003"
        },
        {
            "claim": "A website with 50 articles repeating similar advice is not necessarily more useful than one with five genuinely informative guides.",
            "evidence_type": "page_content",
            "evidence_strength": "medium",
            "source_section": "more-content-doesnt-necessarily-mean-better-search-performance",
            "id": "claim-004"
        },
        {
            "claim": "Content should be created to help people, rather than manipulate search rankings.",
            "evidence_type": "page_content",
            "evidence_strength": "medium",
            "source_section": "what-should-website-owners-take-from-this",
            "id": "claim-005"
        }
    ],
    "services": [
        {
            "name": "AI SEO services & AI search optimisation",
            "relationship": "supporting",
            "url": "/services/zero-click-ai-search-optimisation/"
        }
    ],
    "sections": [
        {
            "id": "overview",
            "heading": "Overview",
            "type": "introduction",
            "content": [
                {
                    "type": "paragraph",
                    "text": "Google finished rolling out its September 2026 spam update on 8 October, almost two weeks after it began. It affected search results worldwide, although Google hasn’t said exactly which types of spam it was targeting. It’s the fourth confirmed spam update this year, following previous updates in March, June and August. For website owners, it’s another reminder that Google continues to invest in identifying content and practices designed to manipulate search rankings. But what does that mean for organisations publishing genuine website content? And with AI now playing a part in how many businesses produce their content, is there anything to be concerned about?"
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "what-has-google-actually-changed",
            "heading": "What has Google actually changed?",
            "type": "section",
            "content": [
                {
                    "type": "paragraph",
                    "text": "Google rolls out spam updates to deal with content and tactics that break its search spam policies. They’re more targeted than core updates, with the focus on attempts to game search rankings. These include copied content that adds little value, misleading pages, excessive keyword targeting and large volumes of content produced primarily to attract search traffic. Importantly, Google hasn’t confirmed which of these practices the September update addressed. Any suggestion that it specifically targeted AI-generated content would therefore be speculation. What we do know is that Google’s existing policies already address the misuse of automation and AI to produce content at scale."
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "does-using-ai-to-write-website-content-put-you-at-risk",
            "heading": "Does using AI to write website content put you at risk?",
            "type": "section",
            "content": [
                {
                    "type": "paragraph",
                    "text": "Not simply because you’ve used AI. Google’s published guidance makes a distinction between using generative AI to help create useful content and using it to produce large quantities of pages without adding value. It’s an important point because AI is becoming part of everyday content production, sometimes without us really thinking about it. Even tools like Grammarly now use AI to improve written content. Organisations also use it to research topics, organise information, develop drafts and improve existing material. We use it ourselves, particularly when exploring subjects, reviewing content and working through different ways of communicating technical information. The important part is what goes into that process and what comes out of it. For example, when we’re writing about university websites, the useful information comes from years of working with university teams, managing complex content and improving accessibility. AI can help us organise and communicate that experience, but it can’t replace the knowledge gained from doing the work. There’s a considerable difference between that approach and asking an AI tool to generate hundreds of articles targeting search terms without adding any original knowledge or insight. Google’s concern isn’t necessarily how quickly content can be produced. It’s whether the resulting pages exist primarily to manipulate rankings rather than help people."
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "more-content-doesnt-necessarily-mean-better-search-performance",
            "heading": "More content doesn’t necessarily mean better search performance",
            "type": "section",
            "content": [
                {
                    "type": "paragraph",
                    "text": "AI has made content production much faster. An article or landing page that once took hours to prepare can now feasibly be created in minutes. That creates opportunities, but it also makes it much easier to publish content without properly questioning whether it’s needed - or indeed if it’s factually correct (we sometimes think of AI as a hasty genius: impressive, but not always right). We’ve seen websites accumulate large numbers of pages covering similar subjects, often because different teams have created content independently or because search opportunities have been identified over time. AI can make that problem considerably worse. A website with 50 articles repeating much the same advice isn’t necessarily more useful than one with five genuinely informative guides. In some cases, overlapping content can make it harder for people to find the information they need and leave search engines with several competing pages covering similar topics. Search data still has an important role. Understanding the terms people use and the questions they’re asking can help organisations identify genuine gaps in their content. But finding a keyword doesn’t automatically mean you need another page. Sometimes the better option is to improve something you’ve already published."
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "what-makes-content-genuinely-useful",
            "heading": "What makes content genuinely useful?",
            "type": "section",
            "content": [
                {
                    "type": "paragraph",
                    "text": "Google’s guidance on helpful content encourages website owners to consider whether their pages provide original information, demonstrate relevant expertise and leave readers feeling they’ve learnt enough to achieve their goal. That doesn’t mean every article needs original research or extensive technical detail (in fact, being overly technical may thoroughly bamboozle your target audience). A straightforward explanation of a common question can be extremely useful, especially when someone who understands the subject writes it. Much of this knowledge already exists within organisations. It might come from specialist teams, questions customers or service users regularly ask, research, project experience or lessons learnt over many years. These are the things that can make your content genuinely useful and difficult to replicate. AI can help turn that knowledge into accessible website content, but someone still needs to provide the information, check its accuracy and decide whether the finished result is worth publishing. Simply rewriting existing online articles using different words doesn’t necessarily achieve that."
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "should-you-review-your-website-following-the-update",
            "heading": "Should you review your website following the update?",
            "type": "section",
            "content": [
                {
                    "type": "paragraph",
                    "text": "If your website has experienced a noticeable change in organic search traffic, it’s worth investigating rather than immediately assuming the latest update is responsible. Google Search Console is a good place to check what has actually changed. Compare performance before and after the rollout, looking at impressions, clicks and the individual pages or search queries affected. Remember that changes in search demand, competition and other ranking factors can also influence performance. Because the update only completed on 8 October, it’s sensible to allow some time for performance data to settle before drawing firm conclusions. Even if your traffic hasn’t changed, reviewing existing content is worthwhile. Look for outdated information, articles covering almost identical subjects, pages with little useful detail and content that no longer reflects what your organisation does. It’s also worth reviewing how AI is being used within your content workflow. Who checks the information? Where does the subject knowledge come from? Is someone responsible for deciding what gets published? These are useful questions regardless of whether Google has recently announced an update."
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "what-should-website-owners-take-from-this",
            "heading": "What should website owners take from this?",
            "type": "section",
            "content": [
                {
                    "type": "paragraph",
                    "text": "Google’s September spam update doesn’t introduce a new set of rules for using AI, and there’s no evidence that organisations using AI-assisted content are automatically being penalised. The existing guidance is reasonably straightforward. The best rule of thumb: content should be created to help people, rather than manipulate search rankings, and using automation to produce large volumes of low-value material can violate Google’s policies. For organisations already investing time in useful, accurate content, there’s no reason to abandon that approach. AI can make parts of the process quicker and help teams make better use of the knowledge they already have. The challenge is making sure that easier content production doesn’t simply lead to more content being published without a good reason. Ultimately, the question worth asking hasn’t really changed: does this page offer something useful to the people we’re trying to reach? If the answer is yes, that’s a much better starting point than worrying about whether AI helped write it."
                }
            ]
        }
    ],
    "entities": [
        {
            "name": "September 2026 spam update",
            "type": "Event"
        },
        {
            "name": "Google Search Console",
            "type": "Tool"
        },
        {
            "name": "Grammarly",
            "type": "Product"
        },
        {
            "name": "Google",
            "type": "Organisation"
        },
        {
            "name": "AI",
            "type": "Technology"
        }
    ],
    "concept_relationships": [
        {
            "subject": "Google spam updates",
            "predicate": "target",
            "object": "content and tactics that break search spam policies"
        },
        {
            "subject": "AI-assisted content",
            "predicate": "distinguished from",
            "object": "scaled content abuse"
        },
        {
            "subject": "Google Search Console",
            "predicate": "used for",
            "object": "performance analysis"
        },
        {
            "subject": "Content quality",
            "predicate": "influences",
            "object": "search performance"
        },
        {
            "subject": "Google spam update",
            "predicate": "impacts",
            "object": "website content"
        },
        {
            "subject": "AI-assisted content",
            "predicate": "requires",
            "object": "human review"
        }
    ],
    "implementation_patterns": [
        {
            "pattern": "Combine AI assistance with organisational knowledge",
            "description": "Use AI to organise and communicate experience, but rely on human expertise for the underlying knowledge.",
            "benefit": "Produces content that is both efficient and genuinely useful."
        },
        {
            "pattern": "Review existing content before creating new pages",
            "description": "When a keyword opportunity is identified, consider improving an existing page rather than adding a new one.",
            "benefit": "Reduces content overlap and improves overall site quality."
        },
        {
            "pattern": "Establish AI content review processes",
            "description": "Define who checks information, where subject knowledge comes from, and who decides what gets published.",
            "benefit": "Ensures accuracy and accountability in AI-assisted content."
        },
        {
            "pattern": "Conduct a content audit",
            "description": "Identify outdated information, duplicate articles, and pages with little useful detail.",
            "benefit": "Improves overall content quality and relevance."
        },
        {
            "pattern": "Use Google Search Console to monitor performance changes",
            "description": "Check impressions, clicks, and affected pages or queries before and after the update.",
            "benefit": "Provides data-driven insights into actual impact."
        }
    ],
    "practical_guidance": [
        {
            "guidance": "Ensure human oversight in AI-assisted content workflows, with clear responsibility for accuracy and publication decisions.",
            "importance": "high"
        },
        {
            "guidance": "Investigate organic traffic changes using Google Search Console, comparing performance before and after the update.",
            "importance": "high"
        },
        {
            "guidance": "Focus on creating genuinely useful content that provides original information and demonstrates expertise.",
            "importance": "high"
        },
        {
            "guidance": "Review existing content for outdated information, duplicate topics, and pages with little useful detail.",
            "importance": "medium"
        },
        {
            "guidance": "Avoid publishing overlapping content; consider improving existing pages instead of creating new ones.",
            "importance": "medium"
        },
        {
            "guidance": "Use AI to support content creation, but ensure human knowledge and review are part of the process.",
            "importance": "high"
        },
        {
            "guidance": "Use search data to identify genuine content gaps, not just keywords to target.",
            "importance": "medium"
        }
    ],
    "risk_areas": [
        {
            "risk": "Publishing large volumes of low-value content using automation",
            "impact": "May violate Google's policies and harm search rankings"
        },
        {
            "risk": "Assuming traffic changes are solely due to the spam update",
            "impact": "May lead to incorrect conclusions and ineffective actions"
        },
        {
            "risk": "Neglecting content quality in favour of quantity",
            "impact": "Reduced user engagement and search performance"
        },
        {
            "risk": "Overlapping content across a website",
            "impact": "Can confuse users and search engines, reducing visibility"
        },
        {
            "risk": "Relying on AI without human review",
            "impact": "May produce factually incorrect or low-quality content"
        }
    ],
    "common_misconceptions": [
        {
            "misconception": "Using AI to write content automatically puts your website at risk.",
            "clarification": "Google distinguishes between using AI to help create useful content and using it to produce large volumes of low-value pages."
        },
        {
            "misconception": "Google's spam update specifically targeted AI-generated content.",
            "clarification": "Google has not confirmed which spam practices were targeted; any such claim is speculation."
        }
    ],
    "technical_context": {
        "spam_update_timeline": "September 2026 spam update rolled out over two weeks, completed 8 October",
        "google_policies": "Search spam policies address misuse of automation and AI to produce content at scale",
        "helpful_content_guidance": "Pages should provide original information, demonstrate relevant expertise, and help readers achieve their goals",
        "google_spam_update": "September 2026 spam update, completed on 8 October",
        "content_quality_factors": "Usefulness, accuracy, human oversight",
        "performance_analysis_tools": "Google Search Console"
    },
    "reasoning_paths": [
        {
            "user_problem": "AI making it easier to publish content without questioning necessity or factual accuracy",
            "evidence_refs": [
                "claim-001",
                "claim-002",
                "claim-005"
            ],
            "relevant_sections": [
                "more-content-doesnt-necessarily-mean-better-search-performance",
                "does-using-ai-to-write-website-content-put-you-at-risk",
                "what-makes-content-genuinely-useful"
            ]
        },
        {
            "user_problem": "Websites accumulating large numbers of overlapping pages covering similar subjects",
            "evidence_refs": [
                "claim-004",
                "claim-002"
            ],
            "relevant_sections": [
                "more-content-doesnt-necessarily-mean-better-search-performance",
                "what-makes-content-genuinely-useful",
                "what-has-google-actually-changed"
            ]
        },
        {
            "user_problem": "Content produced primarily to attract search traffic rather than help people",
            "evidence_refs": [
                "claim-005",
                "claim-002",
                "claim-001"
            ],
            "relevant_sections": [
                "what-has-google-actually-changed",
                "what-should-website-owners-take-from-this",
                "should-you-review-your-website-following-the-update"
            ]
        },
        {
            "user_problem": "Difficulty for users to find information due to overlapping content",
            "evidence_refs": [
                "claim-001",
                "claim-002",
                "claim-005"
            ],
            "relevant_sections": [
                "what-makes-content-genuinely-useful",
                "overview",
                "what-has-google-actually-changed"
            ]
        }
    ],
    "related_links": [
        {
            "text": "Google finished rolling out its September 2026",
            "url": "https://status.search.google.com/incidents/XhUDXP7A67iHCD2kmbVu",
            "source_section": "overview"
        },
        {
            "text": "Google’s published guidance",
            "url": "https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/using-gen-ai-content/",
            "source_section": "does-using-ai-to-write-website-content-put-you-at-risk"
        },
        {
            "text": "Google’s guidance on helpful content",
            "url": "https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content/",
            "source_section": "what-makes-content-genuinely-useful"
        }
    ],
    "content_profile": {
        "content_type": "Insight article",
        "primary_topic": "Google’s September 2026 spam update and its implications for website content, AI-assisted content and content quality.",
        "supporting_topics": [
            "AI-generated content",
            "Scaled content abuse",
            "Helpful content guidance",
            "Content strategy",
            "Search rankings",
            "Google spam update"
        ],
        "primary_audience": [
            "Website owners",
            "Digital teams",
            "Marketing teams",
            "Content teams"
        ]
    },
    "retrieval_topics": [
        "Google’s September 2026 spam update and its implications for website content, AI-assisted content and content quality.",
        "Google spam update September 2026",
        "AI-generated content",
        "Scaled content abuse",
        "Helpful content guidance",
        "Content strategy",
        "Search rankings",
        "Google spam update",
        "AI-assisted content",
        "Content quality",
        "Search performance",
        "Technical SEO"
    ],
    "organisation": {
        "name": "Feel Created",
        "url": "https://www.feelcreated.com/",
        "type": "Digital partner specialising in websites and digital platforms",
        "specialisms": [
            "Digital strategy and planning",
            "User experience (UX) design",
            "Accessibility and inclusive design",
            "WordPress design and development",
            "Content strategy and information architecture",
            "AI-ready structured content",
            "AI Features & Integrations",
            "Search optimisation and technical SEO",
            "Website performance optimisation",
            "Website security and technical governance",
            "Platform architecture and integrations",
            "Content management systems",
            "Digital audits and reviews",
            "Creative and marketing support",
            "Website maintenance and support"
        ],
        "service_model": "We work as an extension of our clients' teams, combining strategy, UX, accessibility, content design, WordPress development and ongoing support to create digital platforms that help organisations communicate more clearly, work more efficiently and grow sustainably."
    }
}